# innoGPT AI platform from Vechta with chat, over 50 models, assistants with tools, scheduled tasks and workflows in public beta. Canonical profile: https://ki-agentenkompass.de/en/agents/innogpt/ Editor: [Michael Meierhoff](https://ki-agentenkompass.de/en/about/) Sources reviewed: 2026-11-05 Basis: provider documentation. Examples are editorial suggestions, not hands-on product tests. ## Overview innoGPT is a proprietary product of Inno KI GmbH in Vechta. The platform combines models from several providers. The data processing article and the security page spell the company "innoki GmbH". - Provider: Inno KI GmbH - Product family: innoGPT - Profile type: AI work platform with assistants, tasks and workflows - Environment: Web interface and desktop app; according to the provider's blog assistants also via widget, in Teams, Slack and through an API - Connections: According to the page over 1,000 tools, including SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, Outlook, Slack, Salesforce and Jira, plus MCP servers and Custom Actions - Setup: Test for 7 days without payment details. For agents you create assistants, connect apps or MCP servers and have admins set up Custom Actions. - Pricing model: Business EUR 25 and Business Max EUR 109 per user per month plus VAT; Enterprise is custom from 1,000 users. ## Key features ### Assistants with tools An assistant combines a role, files and tools such as web search, Code Interpreter, Canvas, connected apps and MCP servers. Skills are automatically active in every chat with it. Source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten ### Subagents An assistant can delegate subtasks to other assistants. You address them with @, or the main assistant loads them automatically. Source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten ### Custom Actions An API can be connected through an OpenAPI, YAML or JSON specification, including for write calls. According to the page the agent chooses the endpoint and parameters itself. Only admins can set this up, and it is not available in normal chat. Source: https://www.innogpt.de/integrations ### Scheduled tasks According to the home page recurring processes such as reports or data maintenance start by schedule or event. According to the changelog routines always ask for approval before actions outside innoGPT. Source: https://www.innogpt.de/ ### Workflows in public beta According to the changelog workflows have been available as a public beta in every workspace since 14 October 2026 and support native triggers from Microsoft 365. The automation page still marks "Workflows & API" as "Coming soon". Source: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog ### Integrations and MCP The page lists over 1,000 tools and native MCP support for your own servers. Local MCP servers in the desktop app can be allowed, tied to confirmation or blocked per tool. Source: https://www.innogpt.de/integrations ### Roles and model access Default roles are Admin, Member and Guest, plus custom roles. Model access can be limited per role, for example to models in the EU. According to the documentation SCIM is still in progress. Source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3370697-nutzerverwaltung-mitglieder-rollen-berechtigungen ## Example workflows ### Create a ticket through an assistant - Your input: An assistant with a Custom Action on the ticket system and a clear role. - Possible result: The assistant chooses the endpoint and parameters and creates the ticket. - What to check: Check each action in the audit log and keep role-based approvals narrow. ### Recurring report - Your input: A scheduled task with a fixed brief, for example a monthly report. - Possible result: The task runs on schedule and delivers the result as its own run. - What to check: Watch for approvals before external actions and check the chosen model's hosting zone. ## Requirements and limits ### Workflows still in beta Limitation: According to the changelog workflows are a public beta. The terms provide beta features "as is", without a guarantee of being error-free. Source: https://www.innogpt.de/agb ### Not all models in Europe Limitation: The home page says the software and "(most)" AI models are hosted in Europe. Admins choose zones such as EU/EU, EU/Global or Global/Global. According to the terms, choosing models outside the EU counts as the customer's consent to the transfer. Source: https://www.innogpt.de/ ### SSO costs extra on Business Requirement: The pricing page lists SSO/SAML on the Business plan as an extra charge, without an amount. Source: https://www.innogpt.de/preis ### No agent details in the plans Limitation: The pricing page mentions agents and automations in no plan. Business promises "all features", and it names no run limits. Source: https://www.innogpt.de/preis ### Error handling Not yet confirmed: The reviewed pages describe neither retries nor error paths for tasks and workflows. Source: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog ### Sub-processors only partly readable Not yet confirmed: The Trust Center lists 31 sub-processors, of which 5 were visible when fetched. The data processing agreement and technical measures are marked "NDA" there. Source: https://trust.innogpt.de/ ## A good fit if … - you want to build assistants with tools, MCP servers and subagents in one workspace - admins should limit model choice per role to zones such as the EU - you want scheduled tasks with approval before external actions ## Less suitable if … - you need to use workflows in production without a beta caveat - you want to read the data processing agreement, technical measures and full sub-processor list without an NDA or request - you require SCIM for user management Editorial assessment based on provider documentation. Not a product test. ## Usable AI models Fixed choice across providers You choose from more than 50 models or let Smart Select decide. Only innoGPT Standard is unlimited; it bundles open models in the EU without naming them. Premium models draw on your plan's budget, and admins set which models are available. The pages mention no keys of your own, and it remains open whether Enterprise self-hosting allows your own models. - Model families named: OpenAI (GPT), Anthropic (Claude), Google (Gemini), Mistral, xAI (Grok), DeepSeek, Meta (Llama, Muse), Cohere, Moonshot (Kimi), Z.ai (GLM) - Model choice: Automatic or your choice - Your own API key: Not stated - Router or custom endpoint: Not stated - Local models: Not stated - Depends on: Plan, Admin approval Documented · Sources accessed on: 2026-11-05 - [innoGPT: AI models](https://www.innogpt.de/en/models) - [innoGPT: Core](https://www.innogpt.de/core) - [innoGPT: Preis](https://www.innogpt.de/preis) - [innoGPT Docs: Sprach- und Bildmodelle](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3678738-sprach-and-bildmodelle) - [innoGPT Docs: innoGPT Standard](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/1950356-innogpt-standard-unbegrenzt-arbeiten-souveran-in-der-eu-gehostet) ## Europe & regional availability Security page, terms, help articles and Trust Center reviewed. The Trust Center showed 5 of 31 sub-processors, and the data processing agreement and technical measures are marked "NDA". The terms give two different revision dates. Reviewed scope: Hosted platform; model zone depending on selection Reviewed on: 2026-11-05 ### Server location With requirements The security page and help article name Frankfurt am Main, the security page also AWS. The pricing page names EU hosting in Berlin for the Section 203 licence, the article on innoGPT Standard its own infrastructure in the EU. The data flow article gives no more detail on the database location beyond Frankfurt. Region covered: EU Documented reason: The pages name different locations depending on the product part; no contract text was readable. Official source: https://www.innogpt.de/datenschutz-sicherheit Official source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/7168320-der-datenfluss-erklart Official source: https://www.innogpt.de/preis Official source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/1950356-innogpt-standard-unbegrenzt-arbeiten-souveran-in-der-eu-gehostet ### Model providers and transfer With requirements The help article names OpenAI through a direct API with standard contractual clauses, Anthropic through Google Vertex in Frankfurt, Google Cloud, Mistral, Perplexity as a US company and Replicate with processing in the USA. Admins choose zones such as EU/EU or Global/Global. According to the terms, choosing models outside the EU counts as consent. Region covered: EU and USA Documented reason: Location and transfer depend on the chosen model. Official source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/2895282-zero-retention-policy Official source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/7168320-der-datenfluss-erklart Official source: https://www.innogpt.de/agb ### "Zero retention" with exceptions With requirements The article promises no training but names retention for abuse detection: OpenAI up to 30 days, Mistral 30 days, Replicate one hour. It gives no period for Perplexity and Google Cloud. Region covered: Per model provider Documented reason: The headline is broader than the stated conditions; the provider lines are what counts. Official source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/2895282-zero-retention-policy ### Data processing agreement Available Workspace admins sign the data processing agreement under Art. 28 GDPR digitally in the settings; according to the article the contracting party is innoki GmbH. The text is marked "NDA" in the Trust Center and was not reviewed. Region covered: EU/EEA Documented reason: The way to sign is documented, the content is not. Official source: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/9973962-avv-anfrage-stellen Official source: https://trust.innogpt.de/ ### Sub-processors and certificates Availability still unclear The Trust Center lists 31 sub-processors; visible when fetched were AWS, Clerk, Cohere, E2B and ElevenLabs, without purpose and location. It lists ISO 27001 and GDPR as "Compliant" and SOC 2 Type 2 as "In progress", with no certificate in the fetch. "GDPR compliant" is a provider claim. Region covered: EU/EEA Documented reason: 26 names and the documents not readable; no authority assessment found. Official source: https://trust.innogpt.de/ Official source: https://www.innogpt.de/datenschutz-sicherheit ## Accounts & permissions Based on provider documentation. Permissions depend on the account, integration and organization policies. Review the permissions actually requested before use. Configuration covered: Hosted platform with workspace administration; self-operation only on the Enterprise plan Sources reviewed: 2026-11-05 ### Account used Documented with conditions: SSO/SAML costs extra on the Business plan. User management knows Admin, Member and Guest as well as custom roles. According to the documentation SCIM is still in progress; until then there is manual maintenance or CSV import. Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/preis Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3370697-nutzerverwaltung-mitglieder-rollen-berechtigungen ### Admin approval Documented: Only admins set up Custom Actions. According to the changelog admins decide which integrations members may connect and enable local folders per member. Routines ask for approval before external actions. Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog ### Data access & team sharing Documented with conditions: Apps must first be connected and authenticated. For Custom Actions the page names role-based approvals and an audit log. The reviewed pages do not describe the reach of individual connections in detail; according to the changelog SharePoint can be limited to selected sites. Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/integrations Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog ## Prices and included usage Pricing checked: 2026-11-05 Prices per user per month plus VAT. The trial lasts 7 days without payment details and includes only standard models. ### Business EUR 25 per user per month; 1 month free with annual payment All features, team collaboration, up to 1,000 users, SSO/SAML at extra charge. Price source: https://www.innogpt.de/preis ### Business Max EUR 109 per user per month More room for premium models for individual users. Price source: https://www.innogpt.de/preis ### Section 203 licence EUR 25 per user per month; annual only for 1 to 20 licences For professional secrecy holders: confidentiality commitment, according to the page EU hosting in Berlin and no model training, enabled by the team. Price source: https://www.innogpt.de/preis ### Enterprise Custom, from 1,000 users Self-hosting or on-premise, dedicated support manager, individual SLAs. Price source: https://www.innogpt.de/preis According to the page standard messages are unlimited, premium models use a budget. Third-party price information was not used. Pricing details: https://www.innogpt.de/preis ## Operation & oversight Based on public provider documentation. Assessments are editorial inferences from the stated properties. Actual time requirements and reliability have not been measured. Deployment covered: Hosted operation by the provider; self-hosting on the Enterprise plan according to the pricing page Sources reviewed: 2026-11-05 ### Files and working state Documented: According to the help article conversations are stored in the database in Frankfurt, and inactive chats are deleted after 180 days. Admins can configure deletion periods. Projects exist independently of individual users; removed members lose their chats permanently. Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/7168320-der-datenfluss-erklart Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/9973962-avv-anfrage-stellen Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3370697-nutzerverwaltung-mitglieder-rollen-berechtigungen ### Sign-ins Documented with conditions: SSO/SAML is an extra charge on the Business plan. MCP connections and apps use their own authentication, Custom Actions a stored auth such as a bearer token. We could not read an article on SSO setup. Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/preis Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/integrations Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3370697-nutzerverwaltung-mitglieder-rollen-berechtigungen ### Starting further runs Documented with conditions: The home page names schedule and event as triggers. The changelog names scheduled tasks, running agent tasks with the status "Running" and native triggers from Microsoft 365. The automation page with "Coming soon" does not match this. Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/ Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/automation ### Human intervention Documented with conditions: According to the changelog routines always ask for approval before actions outside innoGPT. Local MCP tools can be tied to a confirmation. For Custom Actions the agent chooses by itself according to the page, and it names no approval per call. Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/integrations ### Detecting errors Open in reviewed sources: The integrations page names an audit log for every executed action, the changelog an activity log for security-relevant changes. The reviewed pages describe no error view for runs. Evidence: https://www.innogpt.de/integrations Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog ### Resuming after failures Open in reviewed sources: According to the changelog paused tasks and workflows stay stopped. The reviewed pages do not describe retries or resuming aborted runs. Evidence: https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog ### Editorial assessment innoGPT verifiably offers tools, subagents and scheduled runs. The documentation, however, sits mainly in the changelog, and error handling remains open. Check the hosting zone and model provider for each model yourself, because location, retention and transfer depend on them. ## Memory and conversation continuity Scope: Memories for users, assistants and projects Sources accessed: 2026-11-05 Memories exist in the settings, per assistant and per project. According to the data flow article they feed in as context; the articles do not describe deleting and admin rules. ### Storage and scope Partly documented: You set personal details and answer preferences in the settings, company context in the assistant's Memory tab, project details in the project. According to the article the platform for the data flow is in Frankfurt; it names no separate storage location for memories. - [innoGPT Docs: Erinnerungs-Funktion](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/4471776-erinnerungs-funktion) - [innoGPT Docs: Assistenten](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten) - [innoGPT Changelog](https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog) - [innoGPT Docs: Der Datenfluss erklärt](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/7168320-der-datenfluss-erklart) ### Selection and timing Partly documented: You add entries or say "remember this" in chat. According to the documentation memories also update automatically, but it gives no rules for this. They can be imported from ChatGPT. - [innoGPT Docs: Assistenten](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten) - [innoGPT Docs: Erinnerungs-Funktion](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/4471776-erinnerungs-funktion) ### Inspect, edit and delete Partly documented: Entries are in the settings and the assistant tab. The reviewed article does not describe editing and deleting. - [innoGPT Docs: Erinnerungs-Funktion](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/4471776-erinnerungs-funktion) - [innoGPT Docs: Assistenten](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten) ### Agent and channel boundaries Documented: There are separate levels for user, assistant and project. According to the changelog temporary chats do not access memories and do not save new ones. - [innoGPT Changelog](https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog) - [innoGPT Docs: Assistenten](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten) ### Retrieval Partly documented: According to the article the platform adds chat history and, if relevant, content from memories to a request. It does not say how relevance is determined. Entries are split into smaller units to separate topics. - [innoGPT Docs: Der Datenfluss erklärt](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/7168320-der-datenfluss-erklart) - [innoGPT Docs: Erinnerungs-Funktion](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/4471776-erinnerungs-funktion) ### Session reset and compaction Partly documented: According to the article inactive chats are deleted after 180 days. The reviewed pages say nothing about compacting sessions or resetting memories. - [innoGPT Docs: Der Datenfluss erklärt](https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/7168320-der-datenfluss-erklart) ## Context A contract and connections set up for agent use. Model hosting depends on the choice, "zero retention" has exceptions according to the help article, and the full data processing agreement sits behind an NDA label. "GDPR compliant" is a provider claim. Official website, pricing page, security page, terms, help articles, changelog and Trust Center reviewed. The Trust Center showed only parts. Feature descriptions come from the provider; example tasks are editorial. Our own hands-on tests are still pending. ## Open points Europe, availability still unclear: - Sub-processors and certificates Requirements and limits, not yet confirmed: - Error handling - Sub-processors only partly readable ## Sources - https://www.innogpt.de/ - https://www.innogpt.de/preis - https://www.innogpt.de/datenschutz-sicherheit - https://www.innogpt.de/core - https://www.innogpt.de/tools - https://www.innogpt.de/integrations - https://www.innogpt.de/automation - https://www.innogpt.de/datenschutz - https://www.innogpt.de/agb - https://trust.innogpt.de/ - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/8129340-assistenten - https://docs.innogpt.de/changelog - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/7168320-der-datenfluss-erklart - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/2895282-zero-retention-policy - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/1950356-innogpt-standard-unbegrenzt-arbeiten-souveran-in-der-eu-gehostet - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3370697-nutzerverwaltung-mitglieder-rollen-berechtigungen - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/9973962-avv-anfrage-stellen - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/4471776-erinnerungs-funktion - https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3678738-sprach-and-bildmodelle - https://www.innogpt.de/blog/ki-agenten/ki-agent-erstellen ## Provider Inno KI GmbH, based in Vechta, offers the AI platform innoGPT for companies. - Operator: Inno KI GmbH - Organization: Provider - Website: https://www.innogpt.de - Reviewed: 2026-11-05 - Provider source: https://www.innogpt.de/agb - Provider source: https://www.innogpt.de/datenschutz [Sources and method](https://ki-agentenkompass.de/en/sources/)