What it does
7 features
Harvey · Legal AI platform with agents
Product and access
Harvey is a proprietary, sales-led product. Agents are one part of the platform alongside Vault, Spaces and Memory.
Core features
7 features from provider sources · checked on 5 November 2026. Availability and limits are directly below.
Agents for legal work
Agents handle work end to end, such as regulatory briefings or contract drafting from precedent, and return cited, review-ready output. You can preview the plan, adjust the scope and approve the work.
Source 3Vault for document analysis
According to the page, a vault holds up to 100,000 documents. Review tables extract data points from many documents and compare them.
Source 5Shared spaces
Spaces bring firm, clients and internal teams into one matter workspace. Guest accounts give outside users scoped access that administrators control.
Source 6Memory for preferences
Memory keeps working style and output preferences, not client or project details. You can review, edit and delete entries.
Source 4Connector library
Tools such as iManage, SharePoint, Slack or Docusign can be connected via MCP according to the page. Administrators decide which connectors and which user groups are allowed.
Source 8Command Center for administrators
Usage analytics by feature, practice group and region, plus SCIM profile sync and access management.
Source 7
Show all 7 features
Task orchestration
In matter workspaces you assign tasks to Harvey agents, colleagues or clients and see where the work stands. Templates are intended for recurring matters.
Source 9
Usable AI models
Fixed choice across providers
Harvey works with models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral and also trains its own. You choose in the Model Selector or let Harvey decide with "auto". Some models are only open to workspaces that opt in; the pages checked do not mention your own keys or models.
Model families named
- OpenAI (GPT)
- Anthropic (Claude)
- Google (Gemini)
- Mistral
- In-house model
- Model choice
- Automatic or your choice
- Your own API key
- Not stated
- Router or custom endpoint
- Not stated
- Local models
- Not stated
- Depends on
- Admin approval
The rating covers the generally available main access. Documented · Sources accessed on
Harvey: Release notes, model updates · Harvey: Expanding Harvey's model offerings · Harvey: Building a frontier in-house organization
Does it fit my task?
2 practical tasks · 5 requirements and limits
A good fit if …
- your firm or legal department wants a managed platform with agents, a vault and shared matter workspaces
- you want to review and approve agent work before it starts
- administrators should centrally control connectors and access by role
Less suitable if …
- you want to compare prices or try it yourself without talking to sales
- you want to check data location and retention periods on public pages before a contract
- you need a self-run or open-source solution
Editorial assessment based on provider documentation. Not a product test.
Practical tasks
Editorial examples based on documented features. No product tests performed.
Prepare a regulatory briefing
- Your input
- Internal policies and a question about a new regulation.
- Possible result
- An agent drafts a cited memo for leadership.
- What to check
- Review the plan up front and check citations and steps before the draft goes further.
Run a matter in a shared space
- Your input
- A space with template tasks for a recurring matter.
- Possible result
- Tasks go to agents, colleagues or clients; finished work is reviewed in one place.
- What to check
- Assign reviewers per task and check access for outside guests.
Have an agent prepare a regulatory briefing with citations.
Your possible prompt
Compare three providers for [task]. Use their official documentation. Show differences, sources, and open questions in a table.
Adjust the task, data and permissions.
Requirements and limits
Requirement
Access through sales
The home page offers a demo request as the entry point and names neither prices nor a trial.
Source 1Limitation
Memory holds no client details
Memory is personal and stores preferences and working style, not client or project details.
Source 4Not yet confirmed
Event-based triggers
The agents page mentions schedules but describes no event-based triggers.
Source 3Not yet confirmed
Retention and deletion
The security page mentions configurable retention policies and deletion but gives no default periods or deletion timelines.
Source 10Not yet confirmed
Privacy policy does not cover platform content
By its own statement the privacy policy does not apply to inputs and outputs on the platform; it refers to the customer agreement for those.
Source 11
Can I use it?
With requirements
Europe & regional availability
Security page, privacy policy and Trust Center page reviewed. The Trust Center page named neither locations nor subprocessors when fetched.
Reviewed scope: Hosted platform; processing by customer requirement
Reviewed on:
With requirements
Processing in the EU and Switzerland
For customers with data-localisation requirements or preferences, Harvey offers processing in the EU and Switzerland or in Australia according to the security page. The cloud runs on Microsoft Azure. The page does not say which region applies by default.
Region, reason and source
Region covered: EU and Switzerland
Documented reason: Only for customers with such a requirement or preference.
Availability still unclear
Privacy policy and transfers
Harvey acts as a data processor for platform content. The policy does not apply to inputs and outputs on the platform. Personal data it covers may be transferred to servers in the US; it names Standard Contractual Clauses and the EU-US Data Privacy Framework among others.
Region, reason and source
Region covered: EU/EEA, United Kingdom and Switzerland
Documented reason: For customer content the policy refers to the customer agreement; location and transfer terms are set there, not on the reviewed page.
Availability still unclear
Trust Center
The Trust Center page lists SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001 and 42001, GDPR and EU AI Act among its entries. It does not explain what the GDPR and EU AI Act entries rest on.
Region, reason and source
Region covered: EU/EEA
Documented reason: The fetched page contains no statement on availability or data location in Europe.
Accounts & permissions
Based on provider documentation. Permissions depend on the account, integration and organization policies. Review the permissions actually requested before use.
Configuration covered: Hosted platform with administration features
Sources reviewed:
Show all 3 points
Documented
Account used
The security page lists SAML SSO among enterprise controls. Command Center syncs profiles via SCIM. Selected external collaborators get a guest account with scoped, admin-controlled permissions in Spaces, without needing full access to the Harvey platform.
Evidence · Evidence · EvidenceDocumented with conditions
Data access & team sharing
Through connectors Harvey reaches systems such as iManage, SharePoint or Google Drive. Administrators can specify which tools need human confirmation. The reviewed pages do not describe exactly what rights agents hold inside those systems.
Evidence
Memory and conversation continuity
1 of 6 criteria documented
Memory stores personal working style and can be reviewed, edited and deleted; the page does not describe storage location or retrieval.
Memory feature for personal preferences
Sources accessed:
Documentation by criterion
StoragePartly documented
Storage and scope
Memory stores preferences and working style such as drafting conventions and output preferences, not client or project details. According to the page, memories like other workspace content are never used to train AI models. The page does not say where they are stored.
SelectionPartly documented
Selection and timing
You can set preferences upfront or as you work. The page does not describe the rules for what gets saved.
Edit & deleteDocumented
Inspect, edit and delete
Saved memories can be reviewed, edited or deleted anytime in one place. Administrators control how Memory is used across the organisation and can grant access by role.
Access boundariesPartly documented
Agent and channel boundaries
Memory is personal to each user. Saved preferences apply in the web app, Outlook, the Word add-in and playbook runs. The page describes no per-matter level.
RetrievalPartly documented
Retrieval
Saved preferences are applied automatically according to the page. How they are retrieved or weighted is not stated.
New conversationsNot publicly established
Session reset and compaction
Beyond deleting individual entries, the reviewed page says nothing about resetting or compaction.
Cost and effort
1 plan · Prices as of 5 November 2026
Prices and included usage
Pricing checked
The home page names no prices and no free trial; the offered entry point is a demo request.
| Plan | Price | Included |
|---|---|---|
| Harvey | No public price; demo request only | Platform by arrangement with sales. |
- Third-party pricing was not used as evidence.
Setup
Access goes through sales: the home page offers a demo request. Administrators set up document repositories and roles.
Operation & oversight
Based on public provider documentation. Assessments are editorial inferences from the stated properties. Actual time requirements and reliability have not been measured.
Deployment covered: Hosted operation by the provider
Sources reviewed:
Editorial assessment
Harvey is a managed product with approvals before work begins and role control by administrators. For error handling, resumption and retention periods, the contract and Trust Center need to answer.
Show all 6 points
Open in reviewed sources
Detecting errors
According to the agents page, every step is logged for verification. The page does not describe how failures are handled.
EvidenceOpen in reviewed sources
Resuming after failures
The reviewed agents page does not describe how interrupted runs are resumed.
Evidence
Evidence and open questions
12 sources · 5 open points
Open points
The reviewed sources contain no reliable information on these points. A gap says nothing about the product.
Europe: Availability still unclear
Requirements and limits: not yet confirmed
Sources and evidence
Official website pages on platform, security and privacy reviewed. The Trust Center showed only parts when fetched. Feature descriptions come from the provider; example tasks are editorial. Hands-on tests are still pending.
Editorial team: Michael Meierhoff · sources reviewed on . Provider information is not independent evidence of performance.
Provider
Harvey offers an AI platform for legal work.
- Operator
- Harvey
- Organization
- Provider
- Website
- www.harvey.ai
Changes to this profile 1
Commercial AI platform for legal work with agents, document analysis and shared matter workspaces.
These notes describe editorial changes. Source and pricing review dates appear in their respective sections.