One model call, step by step
Receive context
The task, instructions and selected information form the input to the current model call.
With LeaTask: a slot with Lea. Note from memory: Lea prefers mornings.
Generate the next step
The model generates an answer or a tool call with appropriate input values.
With LeaThe model proposes searching the calendar for this week.
Execute and observe
The runtime executes permitted calls and returns the results to the model.
With LeaThe runtime runs the search and places three free slots in context.
Check and continue
Feedback shows progress or errors. A further step or completion follows from it.
With LeaThe slots are there, the invitation is still missing. So another model call follows.
TRY IT YOURSELF
What really changes the model?
Some things change the weights, the learned numbers inside the model. Others only supply working material for the current call. Which is it each time?
You upload your project documents to the chat.
Correct.Not quite. Only the context The documents are working material for this conversation. The model does not permanently learn from them.
The provider trains a new model version.
Correct.Not quite. The weights Training adjusts the weights. This is how learned patterns emerge.
You write: please answer in German.
Correct.Not quite. Only the context Instructions in the prompt steer the output. Parameters stay unchanged during ordinary inference.
A team further trains the model on its own examples.
Correct.Not quite. The weights Additional training can change the weights. That is a separate process outside the normal conversation.
0 of 4 correct.
TRUE OR FALSE?
Three things people often say.
The model runs tools itself.
Correct.Not quite. False It generates a call. The runtime executes permitted calls and enforces access rules.
The same input always means the same answer.
Correct.Not quite. False Outputs can vary for the same input. That is why checks need to fit the task.
Even a confidently worded result needs checking.
Correct.Not quite. True Confident wording is no proof of success. Passed tests or traceable sources, for example, are meaningful.
0 of 3 correct.
Explore the mechanisms
Training shapes capabilities
Training adjusts weights: the numbers used by the neural network in its computations. This produces learned patterns. Further training can change those weights; supplying project documents in a conversation instead provides current working context.
Inference uses what was learned
Using a trained model is called inference. It processes the current input using its existing weights. Examples and instructions in the prompt can guide the output while model parameters remain unchanged during ordinary inference.
The loop enables work steps
An agent connects repeated model calls with a runtime: the software controlling execution. Tool results add context. The model can then adapt its next step; the runtime enforces access rules and stopping conditions.
Results need appropriate checks
Outputs can vary for the same input. Meaningful checks therefore address the actual task: passing tests, traceable sources or satisfied requirements. Confident wording alone is unsuitable as evidence of success.
Fundamentals and primary sources reviewed on 5 November 2026. The examples explain the principle; specific products may differ.
