AGENT PROFILES

Stanley

Stan · Specialist agents

Content agent for ideas, drafts, publishing schedules and performance feedback.

Typical tasks

Availability in Europe
Added to the catalog on Added Stanley with provider sources, access status and boundaries.Details
01

What it does

5 features

Stanley · Personal agent

Product and access

Stanley: separate product profile from the personal-agent research.

Core features

5 features from provider sources · checked on 16 October 2026. Availability and limits are listed below.

  • Suggest ideas

    Derive topics from messages and existing content.

    Source 1
  • Reflect your voice

    Use posts and voice notes as style context.

    Source 1
  • Draft posts

    Prepare content for platforms such as X and LinkedIn.

    Source 1
  • Schedule publishing

    Schedule approved posts in the content calendar.

    Source 1
  • Track performance

    Report results of published posts.

    Source 1

Usable AI models

Models not stated

Stan's build report says the team switched from ChatGPT to Claude during development. The pages checked do not say what Stanley uses today; the privacy policy only refers to unnamed third-party AI providers.

Model families named

None named

Model choice
Not stated
Your own API key
Not stated
Router or custom endpoint
Not stated
Local models
Not stated

The rating covers the generally available main access. Partly documented · Sources accessed on

Stan: How we built Stanley · Stanley: Privacy · Stanley

02

Does it fit my task?

2 practical tasks · 3 requirements and limits

A good fit if …

  • you plan posts for YouTube, X, LinkedIn, Threads, Instagram or Substack
  • you want to approve and adjust drafts via iMessage, Telegram or web
  • you want feedback on views and likes for posts already published

Less suitable if …

  • you need public pricing, which the reviewed sources do not state
  • you are looking for a team with shared management of social accounts

Editorial assessment based on provider documentation. Not a product test.

Practical tasks

Editorial examples based on documented features. No product tests performed.

01

Editorial starter task

Your input
Prepare two LinkedIn drafts from a personal voice note for review.
Possible result
A reviewable draft with open questions and the inputs used.
What to check
Compare the result with the inputs; approve external actions only after personal review.
02

Example: Reflect your voice

Your input
A bounded task for “Reflect your voice” with approved sample data.
Possible result
Use posts and voice notes as style context.
What to check
Compare the result with the inputs; approve external actions only after personal review.
EDITORIAL EXAMPLE

Prepare two LinkedIn drafts from a personal voice note for review.

Your possible prompt

Organize these shared documents by topic. Create an overview with deadlines and next steps. Prepare draft replies for my approval.

Adjust the task, data and permissions.

Requirements and limits

  • Requirement

    Access

    iMessage, Telegram, WhatsApp or web; connect social accounts.

    Source 1
  • Limitation

    Specific boundary

    Displayed reach figures are provider examples; results have not been measured here.

    Source 1
  • Not yet confirmed

    German and reliability

    German interaction and success rates have not been tested hands-on here.

    Source 1
03

Can I use it?

Availability still unclear

Europe & regional availability

Original sources reviewed; specific country availability remains unresolved.

Reviewed scope: Product access, channels and regional evidence
Reviewed on:

  • Availability still unclear

    Europe: specific availability unconfirmed

    Stanley offers access through a US phone number, Telegram, WhatsApp or email. The product page does not confirm European account and publishing availability.

    Region, reason and source

    Region covered: Germany, EU/EEA, United Kingdom and Switzerland

    Documented reason: The reviewed sources identify no regulatory reason for a regional restriction.

    Official source · www.getstanley.ai

Europe and regulation explained

Accounts & permissions

Based on provider documentation. Permissions depend on the account, integration and organization policies. Review the permissions actually requested before use.

Configuration covered: Hosted Stanley account for creators with connected social media accounts

Sources reviewed:

Show all 3 points
  • Documented with conditions

    Account used

    The home page names iMessage, Telegram and the web as ways to use Stanley and shows logos for YouTube, X, LinkedIn, Threads, Instagram and Substack. The privacy policy describes connecting Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube. For YouTube it names the YouTube API Services, and you revoke access in Google security settings. It does not describe how the Instagram and LinkedIn connections work technically.

    Evidence · Evidence
  • Open in reviewed sources

    Admin approval

    The terms describe a personal, non-transferable account. The reviewed pages do not mention approval or restriction by organisation administrators.

    Evidence
  • Documented

    Data access & team sharing

    According to the privacy policy, Stanley accesses content and profile data of connected accounts and, for YouTube, analytics data such as views and watch time. AI providers are contractually bound to use your data only for the requested service and not to train on it. The policy does not mention team sharing; according to the terms you are solely responsible for everything published through the service.

    Evidence · Evidence
04

Memory and conversation continuity

0 of 6 criteria documented

Personalization from posts, performance data and personal background.

Stanley content agent for social media accounts

Sources accessed:

Documentation by criterion

StoragePartly documented

Storage and scope

Posts, performance data, voice and background provide context. A distinct durable memory store is not technically described.

SelectionPartly documented

Selection and timing

Stanley analyzes posts and audiences for personalized suggestions. Automatic fact extraction from conversations is not publicly explained.

Edit & deleteNot publicly established

Inspect, edit and delete

The product sources do not document a complete flow to inspect, edit or delete individual learned memories.

Access boundariesPartly documented

Agent and channel boundaries

Personalization concerns the individual creator and connected social accounts. Shared team memory is not explained.

RetrievalPartly documented

Retrieval

The vendor describes recalling earlier stories and analyzing past posts. The exact retrieval mechanism remains unspecified.

New conversationsNot publicly established

Session reset and compaction

The sources explain neither the durability of conversation memories in new chats nor context compaction.

05

Cost and effort

Prices as of 16 October 2026

Prices and included usage

Pricing checked

Public pricing amounts unconfirmed in the reviewed sources.

  • Pricing reflects reviewed sources; confirm unlisted amounts and access with the provider.

Pricing details

Setup

iMessage, Telegram, WhatsApp or web; connect social accounts.

Operation & oversight

Based on public provider documentation. Assessments are editorial inferences from the stated properties. Actual time requirements and reliability have not been measured.

Deployment covered: Hosted service, operated via iMessage, Telegram or web

Sources reviewed:

Editorial assessment

According to the terms, publishing happens only with your approval, which guards against unwanted posts. Details on errors, connection expiry and recovery are missing, so check scheduled posts yourself.

Show all 6 points
  • Open in reviewed sources

    Files and working state

    The reviewed pages do not describe which content and working state persist between runs. The privacy policy gives no general retention periods; YouTube data is deleted when you disconnect the channel.

    Evidence
  • Open in reviewed sources

    Sign-ins

    Validity and expiry of social connections are not documented. The privacy policy does not describe how access tokens are stored.

    Evidence
  • Documented

    Starting further runs

    According to the home page, Stanley sends you ideas and draft concepts on its own, fills the week and posts at the right time on each platform. The terms say publishing happens only at your direction.

    Evidence · Evidence
  • Documented

    Human intervention

    According to the terms, Stanley publishes only on your direction: you publish yourself or approve a post and schedule it. For TikTok you must review each post and confirm its settings.

    Evidence
  • Open in reviewed sources

    Detecting errors

    Logs or notifications for failed publications are not described in the reviewed sources. The home page shows example messages about views and likes.

    Evidence
  • Open in reviewed sources

    Resuming after failures

    Retrying or resuming after failures is not described. The home page only shows Stanley moving posts when your day changes.

    Evidence
06

Evidence and open questions

2 sources · 2 open points

Open points

The reviewed sources contain no reliable information on these points. A gap says nothing about the product.

Europe: Availability still unclear

Requirements and limits: not yet confirmed

Sources and evidence

Provider sources reviewed; the following examples are editorial suggestions, not hands-on tests.

Editorial team: Michael Meierhoff · sources reviewed on . Provider information is not independent evidence of performance.

Read profile as Markdown

How we assess the sources

Provider

Provider of Stanley; identity and features documented through linked sources.

Operator
Stan
Organization
Provider
Provider sourcesSource 1 Source 2 Reviewed
Changes to this profile 1
  • Added Stanley with provider sources, access status and boundaries.

These notes describe editorial changes. Source and pricing review dates appear in their respective sections.